<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technosailor - Latest Comments in A minute on blogging</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://technosailor.disqus.com/a_minute_on_blogging/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:39:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A minute on blogging</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2006/02/13/a-minute-on-blogging/#comment-1030884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also check out RocketPost, it's quite advanced.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.anconia.com/rocketpost" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.anconia.com/rocketpost"&gt;http://www.anconia.com/rock...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:39:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A minute on blogging</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2006/02/13/a-minute-on-blogging/#comment-1030883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We hope you like it (Qumana).  I believe (but don't hold me to this .. no doubt it depends upon what/how you blog) that Q may be a bit more flexible or fully featured than Performancing, but yes, clearly, the designers and developers of Performancing have done a nice job.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Please feel free to enquire if you need support, and we really do suck up any feedback people care to offer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jon Husband</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:05:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>