<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technosailor - Latest Comments in Feeding Frenzy</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:18:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Feeding Frenzy</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2006/08/12/feeding-frenzy/#comment-1033513</link><description>I think the problem with having info on demand is that it can be overwhelming indeed. Haha, don't worry man, there are millions of people out there; some of them are bound to find your content interesting. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just let your writing flow. Things will get interesting on their own, as long as you have le passion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rico</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:18:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Feeding Frenzy</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2006/08/12/feeding-frenzy/#comment-1033512</link><description>Well, I subscribe to far too many feeds, but like you say, the good headlines are key.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When I come home from a long day and see 600 unread items in my reader, I go, "ohhhhh crap". I only end up reading 50-100, depending on my energy level, and I only read the ones with catchy titles. (Well, I always read my friends' feeds... they have their own little folder and I do read them whether they promise to be interesting or not.) So yep, I agree.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;side note: Now I'm feeling vast amounts of pressure to stay interesting. (thanks a lot) The thought of losing a reader when you only have 2 is horrible! :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Erin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:22:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>