<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technosailor - Latest Comments in New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://technosailor.disqus.com/new_years_day/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:29:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking good.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:29:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028388</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're having email issues. I sent you a message at home and got "Recipient's mailbox is full, message returned to sender. (#5.2.2)"&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;It's always the little things, isn't it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.M. Hardin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 06:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028387</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes...forgot about you..... oops. Email me at aaron [dot] brazell [at] ngc [dot] com&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 14:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never fear, gleeful. There's not much to ruin. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:58:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been buggin' sara about c# to... it's been a long time since I looked at it, and I decided to actually use it for something the other day..&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;Ironic, becuase last week I learned enough Actionscript to be dangerous :P&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;- Eric&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Coleman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028384</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hold on, SHE obviously had to work New Years Day.  Why is she so suprised you had to also?  Hell, I prefer working holidays.  None of those pesky users around to keep bugging me while I'm trying to get real work done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PsychoPhil</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wel also don't spend billions of dollars every time we get in a car, Stacie. Billions of dollars for what? To launch people into space to conduct some experiments? Is it worth the risk?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;Now here's a good percentage analogy. There have been approximately 115 Shuttle missions since the shuttle was first put into commission. Of those missions, two ended fatally (Challenger-1986; Columbia-2003). Doing the math, that is 1.7% (let's say 2%) of all shuttle missions are doomed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;Now let's assume for a minute that Americans get into the car to drive somewhere 10 billion times in a year. Using that same 2% fatality rate, 34 MILLION of those "trips" are doomed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;See where I'm going with this? a 2% safety risk is unacceptable in my book. If we can't get into space safely and return safely, we have no business being there. Outer space will always be there. Let's get this right before we go back.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:40:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028382</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for clarifying.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sara</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Years Day</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2005/01/01/new-years-day/#comment-1028381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oooo...not the dreaded Monad vulnerability....no, anything but that....&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carol Ott</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:02:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>