<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technosailor - Latest Comments in Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://technosailor.disqus.com/open_letter_to_google_feedburner/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:24:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Feedburner has more potential than its price of $100 million......I really admire Google :)...in future this deal will be more fruitful for Google than their acquisition of doulbleclick.....funny thing is; Not in terms of Ad Network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As, a feedburner user i really expect its identity to kept intact by Google. Good luck / Congratulation to Both of Them!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amit Dixit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:24:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...yeah, I just meant "little guys" as compared to Google, Yahoo, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis Seitler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 03:39:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bad day for the web publishing community. How long before Big G buy up all the competition?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are now adopting a new rule. Purchase or Punish. If a competitor is amenable to being purchased, then do it. If not, then punish them in the SERPs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am so unbelievably pissed off with this "deal" it's not true.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 00:55:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FeedBurner _owns_ that market. They aren't the little guy. They are synonymous with 'feed stats'. You practically expect most feeds to use FeedBurner these days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary King</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 22:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know of anyone who considers FeedBurner to be "the little guy". Remember &lt;a href="http://technosailor.com/podcast-rick-klau-of-feedburner/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technosailor.com/podcast-rick-klau-of-feedburner/"&gt;the podcast interview with Rick Klau&lt;/a&gt; where we were talking about the market share that FB has.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 21:15:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Open Letter to Google, Feedburner</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/05/24/open-letter-to-google-feedburner/#comment-928696901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to admit that I would love to be behind a tool that I could sell in a few years for $100 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, I wouldn't want to screw over people who fell in love with that tool specifically because it was run by "one of the little guys." As much as I like Google, they're beginning to creep me out...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis Seitler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>