http://technosailor.disqus.com/enThu, 10 Jul 2008 21:35:19 -0000http://technosailor.com/2008/07/08/the-quest-for-email-ninjahood-i-admit-that-i-have-a-problem/#comment-928698055<p>Awesome. :)</p>marifromkyThu, 10 Jul 2008 21:35:19 -0000http://technosailor.com/2008/07/08/the-quest-for-email-ninjahood-i-admit-that-i-have-a-problem/#comment-928698054<p>I'm happy to help in any way with your becoming an "email ninja." Thanks for the link and best of luck, Aaron!</p>Jared GoralnickThu, 10 Jul 2008 18:30:43 -0000http://technosailor.com/2008/07/08/the-quest-for-email-ninjahood-i-admit-that-i-have-a-problem/#comment-928698047<p>Ben-</p><p>Despite my background as a developer, I'm not sure human ingenuity should always be replaced by an algorithm. End of the day, we all can identify what is *truly* important and take appropriate action. I'll touch on this stuff in later posts. :)</p>Aaron BrazellTue, 08 Jul 2008 23:41:50 -0000http://technosailor.com/2008/07/08/the-quest-for-email-ninjahood-i-admit-that-i-have-a-problem/#comment-928698046<p>I'm thinking about channel control ... "I didn’t need to be seeing every single email on my Blackberry. Not even close." is key ... and find myself pondering coupling.</p><p>There are (at least) two aspect to importance, something like significance (consequence of not dealing with it) and then something like time-sensivity (consequence of lag / latency / delay / postponement) ... something bacn can be quite important in the moment because it's going to change in value very quickly.</p><p>I bet there's an elegant formula in there somewhere, something like how the "quality" of money relates to the amount of money in circulation and the velocity of that money.</p>Ben TremblayTue, 08 Jul 2008 22:18:15 -0000