Community Page
- technosailor.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Interesting article and comments. A couple of things to consider: 1. Open Office 3.0 for the Mac or Google Docs 2. The faster startup (boot and hibernating) and lack of crashing OS can really...
- I really like the approach you've taken into prove the price specifications, cause at the end of the day, it is a yesterdays fact, that Mac is more expensive than PC, nevertheless you have...
- I didn't know you were a fanboy. When did that happen?
- You can create PDFs with a little program called PDF Converter 5 Pro from Buy.com for $99. Throw in a copy of OpenOffice software and the Dell is cheaper than the Apple. I don't buy it.
- Totally agree that many companies should not consider the Apple solution. That said, most 'no' answers are based on the pricepoint of hardware and in many cases, the TCO is actually cheaper...
Jump to original thread »
Comments are closed for this post.
No excerpt available. Jump to website »
4 years ago
4 years ago
No, the reason that dual-partition images are old school is that two is far too few! ;-)
Seriously: I’ve found that Windows machines perform FAR better when the drive is partitioned in smaller pieces. One prominent principle is that you need to keep free space near to where it will be needed. For this reason, you’ll get better performance by putting the user’s profile and major application directories on separate partitions. Partitions can still be linked (via Win2k’s path mounting) to the same place in the file tree, and can be (to neophytes) indistinguishable from directories on the C: partition.
Similary, swap performance can be enhanced by giving swap its own partition near the start of the drive. (Rule of thumb: swap should be near or in the most-used partition on the least-used hard drive.)
E-mail and other major applications will each benefit from having separate partitions, which are now easier to utilize because they can be mounted and made to look like regular directories. I would consider moving the entire “Program Files” tree to its own partition.
And you get double points if you can do this across two or more drives.
The side benefit is that a scrambled root partition should require re-imaging only the root partition, leaving all the user’s profile and other data intact in the separate partitions.
Furthermore, this will reduce the need for defragmentation, thereby giving you an additional day-to-day performance boost.
Try it on your own system. Find the 3 largest directories on your drive (e-mail? user profile? ) and segregate them into separate partitions. (FullDisk http://www.worldlynx.net/pgerhart/_fuldsk.html can help with the analysis.) It will make a big difference in your daily computing experience.