<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technosailor - Latest Comments in Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://technosailor.disqus.com/yahoo_could_have_owned_social_networking/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:49:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702829</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey is Yahoo aquiring student based Social Networking site in India???? Heard Yahoo is in Negotiations with a competetor of &lt;a href="http://Orkut.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Orkut.com"&gt;Orkut.com&lt;/a&gt; in India. That site is a simple student site called &lt;a href="http://bharatstudent.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bharatstudent.com"&gt;bharatstudent.com&lt;/a&gt;. we dont know how yahoo tries to compete with Orkut which is already a leader in India using a start up site like &lt;a href="http://Bharatstudent.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bharatstudent.com"&gt;Bharatstudent.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deisha</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:49:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702828</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points...Yahoo is playing catch-up when they shouldn't have to. I expect them to overpay for whatever social networking service they end up with. Yahoo needs to make some moves, especially after Semel leaving.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kieran</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I think you &lt;a href="http://technosailor.com/dragons-in-the-yahoo-myspace-talks/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://technosailor.com/dragons-in-the-yahoo-myspace-talks/"&gt;have to blow up 360&lt;/a&gt; if MySpace is a Yahoo property, but we'll see.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:52:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are so right about yahoo, they have admitted to dropping the &lt;a href="http://www.buzznetworker.com/yahoos-goal-is-to-improve-their-social-networking/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.buzznetworker.com/yahoos-goal-is-to-improve-their-social-networking/"&gt;ball on social networking.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Bebo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Bebo.com"&gt;Bebo.com&lt;/a&gt; was another social networking site they have been rumored in purchasing, there was the failed Facebook deal, and now this rumored MySpace deal. I am interested to see if Google steps in with this though because of the deal they have with MySpace with their advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are right about &lt;a href="http://Orkut.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Orkut.com"&gt;Orkut.com&lt;/a&gt;, it is HUGE in India. The features are horrible, like you said, I have tried to use it to review it and I have had nothing but technical problems with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. I always wonder if yahoo is just going to acquire, blow up 360 and do it right, or just continually drop the ball.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kevin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:44:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Aaron&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Google has little reach in social networking outside of youtube."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well &lt;a href="http://orkut.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="orkut.com"&gt;orkut.com&lt;/a&gt; practically owns the Social networking in India...... not even met one college guy whos joined facebook or myspace out here. With the worlds second alrgest population livin oblivious to myspace and facebook. Those highest subriber stats dont seem that mighty to me. Altho would agree that orkut is way behind in terms of features...but who knows..all it takes is one fine day..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:33:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My point is that they are two different areas. Google has little reach in social networking outside of youtube. It's an area waiting to be exploited by one of the giants and yahoo is most poised to do so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo can't out-Google Google; the question, for me, is if the social stuff can act as a new paradigm for using the web that beats search.  I'm not sure it does.  It's useful, but it doesn't monetize as easily, and it is by definition constraining rather than expansive.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Gershman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702814</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tamar: I have a post coming tomorrow morning that analyzes this rumored deal. You'll want to check it out as I talk about what this deal would need to be successful.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Brazell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To be honest, I don't think that MySpace is worth that much.  I'd love to know how many *unique* (and real) people are actually using it regularly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Yahoo goes the MySpace route, they should fix it up so that it's a comparable product to Facebook.  Right now, Facebook (imo) is totally winning out in every way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tamar Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yahoo Could Have Owned Social Networking</title><link>http://technosailor.com/2007/06/20/yahoo-could-have-owned-social-networking/#comment-928702807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If yahoo bought facebook for 1 billion and not messed with it, let the founders implement their vision including the f8 apps, then yes. But I dont think they could have allowed that course. They would have messed with it like they did with flickr and face book would not be what it is today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christian Burns</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:53:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>